![]() That mean when you're attacking in mode that doesn't use a Prey supported feat, your combat prowess drops precipitously. Ranger's melee feats or ranged feats are limited to Prey. But the Ranger is the one class whose combat feats really make you choose one combat style over another because of the Prey mechanic. Any class can switch between weapons in a single fight. ![]() I would also call these "combat styles" as opposed to tactics and question the basis for saying the class is 'really good" at mixing them. While you can certainly go that route, that would be true for any class. "Depending on the decisions you make in character creation, you may end up with a precise archer, a deadly two weapon fighter, a 2-handed weapon wielder or even a mix of them all, because this class is also really good at mixing tactics" The Ranger has no 2-handed weapon support. So I submit that using the word "excel" is not entirely accurate and arguably misleading.ģ. Even on Prey, the Ranger does not out damage a Fighter. What is demonstrably true is that the ranger essentially sucks at attacking anything that isn't designated as Prey (Outwit Ranger sucks regardless). The Ranger's single target damage isn't any better than any other classes single target damage, and notably worse than the Fighters or Barbarians, and probably the Rogue (with Sneak Attack and Dex to Damage). IMO, it would be more accurate to say the Ranger is constrained to single target focus. "Rangers excel at focusing on a single enemy due to their Hunter’s Edge, they put the eye on one target and hunt it until they are no more" The Ranger doesn't "excel" at single target focus. there's no critical path for a build, but others may feel like the class never really comes together.ģ. There is a tremendous lack of synergy in the feat designs. I'll point out that i have been playing rangers since the launch of PF2, and IME, this is a very disjointed class. ![]() I do see you're generally arguing Precision for ranged/switching, Flurry for melee, Outwit for Support, but you sometimes blur the lines and that tends to blur the ratings.Ģ. It would help if you identified your default Ranger in terms of what you're expecting the class to do: Frontline, ranged, support are a good place to start. You do, in some cases, account for the different edges, but there are more facets or reasons to choose or not choose a feat other than just Edge. You're rating feats/abilities, but a lot of how one scores something depends on specific criteria. I do think this guide, like many, tends to overstate the case.ġ. Your english is fine, though I will suggest that some word choices tend to be less accurate.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |